AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

GEORGE NASH, Plaintiff, v. ILLINOIS STATE POLICE COMMISSIONER, et al., Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MICHAEL REAGAN, District Judge

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's motion to withdraw his claim due to filing in the incorrect district (Doc. 11) which this Court liberally construes as a notice of voluntary dismissal of the action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This notice has been given before any opposing party has filed either an answer or motion for summary judgment. Consequently, voluntary withdrawal of his complaint is Plaintiff's right under Rule 41(a)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedcure. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Furthermore, all pending motions are DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NASH v. ILLINOIS STATE POLICE COMMISSIONER
(Sep 10, 2009)