Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

CHLOE, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. MOHAMMED ALEXANDER ZARAFSHAN A/K/A ALEXANDER ZAR, ET AL., Defendants.

ORDER

RICHARD HOLWELL, District Judge

On July 21, 2009, the Court received a thorough and thoughtful Report and Recommendation (the "Report") from the Honorable Michael H. Dolinger, United States Magistrate Judge for the Southern District of New York, advising that plaintiffs are entitled to recover $7,200,000.00 in disgorged profits from defendant Mohammed Alexander Zarafshan a/k/a Alexander Zar ("Zar"). The Report also advises that plaintiffs are entitled to an award of attorneys' fees and costs; plaintiffs, however, have since withdrawn their application for attorneys' fees and costs. Mr. Zar is aware of this litigation and has appeared for a deposition, but the Court has not received any objections to the Report to date.

If a party fails to object to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, a district court's review is ordinarily limited to ascertaining whether clear error appears on the face of the record. See Nelson v. Smith, 618 F. Supp. 1186, 1189 (S.D.N.Y. 1985). The Court has reviewed the Report and finds no such error. Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report.

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CHLOE v. ZARAFSHAN
(Sep 14, 2009)