Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

Charles M. CASSELL, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. P.A. WILLIAMS; Owens, Dr.; Connor, Officer; Hinsin, Officer; Wade, Officer; Mills, Officer, Monroe, Officer; Gragrinis, Officer; Washington, Sgt.; Sergeant Burgess; Officer Blow; Officer Hardee; Nurse Henry; All Officers Sgts. on Grey Unit; Captain Maddox, Defendants-Appellees.

PER CURIAM:

Charles M. Cassell, III, seeks to appeal the district court's order providing him twenty days to file an amended complaint in compliance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 8. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Cassell seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CASSELL v. WILLIAMS
(Sep 16, 2009)