PER CURIAM.
Denied. See Ellis v. Henning, 678 So.2d 825, 827 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) ("Without a transcript or sworn factual allegations concerning the context in which the trial judge's alleged comments arose, we do not find that the allegations in plaintiffs motions to disqualify set forth a legally sufficient ground for recusal. . . . A trial judge's expression of dissatisfaction with counsel or a client's behavior alone does not give rise to a reasonable belief that the trial judge is biased and the client cannot receive a fair trial.").