AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

TIMOTHY SUPHANKOMUT, as Administrator of the Estate of AMPHAN PHETDUM, Deceased, Respondent, v. CHI-TEH YU, M.D., et al., Appellants.

It is hereby ordered that the order insofar as appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motions are granted and the note of issue and certificate of readiness are vacated, and the second ordering paragraph is vacated.

Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying defendants' motions seeking to vacate the note of issue and certificate of readiness. Defendants sought the relief within 20 days after service of the note of issue and certificate of readiness, and they provided affidavits establishing that discovery was incomplete when the note of issue and certificate of readiness were filed. Thus, "a material fact in the certificate of readiness [was] incorrect" ( 22 NYCRR 202.21 [e]; see Shoop v Augst, 305 AD2d 1016, 1017; see also Aviles v 938 SCY Ltd., 283 AD2d 935). We therefore reverse the order insofar as appealed from, grant defendants' motions and vacate the note of issue and certificate of readiness, and vacate the second ordering paragraph to permit the further discovery sought by defendants.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SUPHANKOMUT v. YU
(Oct 2, 2009)