AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NAHSHON T. THOMAS, Appellant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court providently exercised its discretion in upwardly departing from the defendant's presumptive sex offender level ( see People v Villane, 49 AD3d 517, 517-518; People v Fabara, 49 AD3d 619). The court's determination was supported by clear and convincing evidence based, inter alia, on the case summary prepared by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, the defendant's mental health evaluation, and the probation department report ( see People v Fabara, 49 AD3d 619).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. THOMAS
(Oct 13, 2009)