AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of CAROL MERANDO, Appellant, v. COLLEEN VANTASSEL, Respondent.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

Since the child is now over 18 years of age, she is no longer subject to the order appealed from ( see Matter of DelVecchio v DelVecchio, 64 AD3d 594; Matter of McGovern v Lynch, 62 AD3d 712; Matter of Luis A.S., 33 AD3d 793, 794). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed as academic ( see Matter of Cruz v Cruz, 48 AD3d 804, 805; Matter of Zaim R., 43 AD3d 824; Matter of Sassower-Berlin v Berlin, 31 AD3d 771). The matter does not qualify as an exception to the mootness doctrine ( see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715; Matter of Ronald N., 14 AD3d 567).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MERANDO v. VANTASSEL
(Oct 13, 2009)