Citation Codes Equivalent Citations citation codes Docket Number No. 09-1289. Attorney(S) Christina D. Perry-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Wilbur Jacobs, II, Christian Barton, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, Melvin Wayne Ringer, City Attorney's Office, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Judges Paul Victor Niemeyer M. Blane Michael Acts Judiciary And Judicial Procedure — Courts Of Appeals — Jurisdiction And Venue — Final Decisions Of District Courts Judiciary And Judicial Procedure — Courts Of Appeals — Jurisdiction And Venue — Interlocutory Decisions See more information ... Smart Summary Please sign up to generate summary. Christina D. PERRY-BEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF NORFOLK, VIRGINIA, Defendant-Appellee. Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Christina D. Perry-Bey seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing her complaint without prejudice. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Perry-Bey seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED.