AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of SOPHIA P., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES, Respondent; EMAN C., Appellant, et al., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of SAMANTHA J., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES, Respondent; EMAN C., Appellant, et al., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 2.) In the Matter of CHRISTINA J., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES, Respondent; EMAN C., Appellant, et al., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 3.)

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court's finding of neglect as to Christina J. and Samantha J., based on the mother locking them out of her home overnight, and locking Samantha J. in a room while she left the home to go to the bank, is supported by a preponderance of the evidence ( see Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [B]; § 1046 [b] [i]). Furthermore, because the mother's conduct toward Christina J. and Samantha J. demonstrated a fundamental defect in her understanding of parental duties relating to the care of children, there was sufficient evidence to make a finding of derivative neglect as to Sophia P. ( see Family Ct Act § 1046 [a] [i]; Matter of Amber C., 38 AD3d 538).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE SOPHIA P
(Oct 20, 2009)