AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

LAMONT O. DOUGLAS, et al. Plaintiffs v. ROBERT A. RATLIFF, et al., Defendants.

ORDER

HERMAN WEBER, District Judge

This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 37) to which neither party has objected.

Upon a de novo review of the record, the Court finds that the Judge has accurately set forth the applicable law and has properly applied it to the particular facts of this case. Accordingly, in the absence of any objection by plaintiff, this Court accepts the Report as uncontroverted.

The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 37) is hereby ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. Plaintiff Lamont Douglas's Motion to Supplement RICO claim (doc. no. 26) is DENIED and defendant's Motion to Dismiss and/or for Summary Judgment (doc. no. 25) is GRANTED. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED AND TERMINATED on the docket of this Court at plaintiff's cost.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Exhibit

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DOUGLAS v. RATLIFF
(Oct 20, 2009)