Ordered that the fact-finding order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the mother's contention, the Family Court's finding of neglect is supported by a preponderance of the evidence ( see Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]; Matter of Tristan R., 63 AD3d 1075; Matter of Jonathan W., 17 AD3d 374, 375). The out-of-court statements of the subject children, Madison H. and Mark B., sufficiently cross-corroborated one another ( see Matter of Tristan R., 63 AD3d 1075; Matter of Joshua B., 28 AD3d 759). Viewing the record as a whole, and according great weight to the hearing court's credibility determinations, we discern no basis to disturb the Family Court's finding of neglect as to both children ( see Matter of Michael M., 39 AD3d 550, 551; Matter of Joshua B., 28 AD3d 759; compare Matter of Peter G., 6 AD3d 201).