ARTS4ALL, LTD. v. HANCOCK

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 206 SSM 32.

Attorney(S)

Trachtenberg Rodes Friedberg LLP, New York City ( David G. Trachtenberg of counsel), for appellant. Law Offices of Zachary R. Greenhill, P.C., New York City ( Zachary R. Greenhill of counsel), for respondents.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 206 SSM 32.

Attorney(S)

Trachtenberg Rodes Friedberg LLP, New York City ( David G. Trachtenberg of counsel), for appellant. Law Offices of Zachary R. Greenhill, P.C., New York City ( Zachary R. Greenhill of counsel), for respondents.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

ARTS4ALL, LTD., et al., Respondents, v. JUDITH L. HANCOCK, Appellant, and Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellant. DANIEL Y.C. NG et al., Additional Counterclaim Defendants, and PETER OSGOOD, Additional Counterclaim Defendant-Respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals ( 22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered as unnecessary. The courts below did not abuse their discretion in dismissing defendant's counterclaims pursuant to CPLR 3126 (3) ( see Arts4All, Ltd. v Hancock, 12 NY3d 846). Defendant's remaining argument is without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

ARTS4ALL, LTD., et al., Respondents, v. JUDITH L. HANCOCK, Appellant, and Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellant. DANIEL Y.C. NG et al., Additional Counterclaim Defendants, and PETER OSGOOD, Additional Counterclaim Defendant-Respondent.

Comments