Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

WARREN DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. DARBY BOROUGH, et al., Defendants.

ORDER

ANITA BRODY, District Judge

AND NOW, this 21st day of October 2009, upon consideration of Defendant Constable Michael Connor's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #15) and Plaintiff Warren Davis's Response (Doc. #21), it is ORDERED that Defendant's Motion is DENIED without prejudice.

In addition, in light of the Stipulation of Counsel I approved on June 18, 2009 (Doc. #22), it is further ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Darby Borough and Officer Matthew Rinderer (Doc. #17) is DENIED as moot.

In the Stipulation of Counsel between Davis and Defendants Darby Borough and Officer Rinderer that I approved, Davis agreed to withdraw with prejudice his claims under the Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments; his claim under the Pennsylvania Constitution; his claim of punitive damages against Darby Borough and Officer Rinderer in his official capacity; and his claim of wrongful and/or false imprisonment against Darby Borough. These were all the claims Defendants Darby Borough and Officer Matthew Rinderer sought to dismiss in their Motion.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DAVIS v. BOROUGH
(Oct 21, 2009)