Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

JOHN DOE, et al v. KENNETH SCHNEIDER, et al.

ORDER

MITCHELL GOLDBERG, District Judge

AND NOW, this 29th day of October, 2009, upon consideration of Defendants Kenneth Schneider, Bernard Schneider, Marjorie Schneider, Susan Schneider and The Apogee Foundation's Motion to Dismiss, the response filed in opposition and the reply thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' Motion (Doc. #5) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as follows:

• Defendants' Motion as to Count I is denied;
• Defendants' Motion as to Count II is denied;
• Defendants' Motion as to Count III is granted in part. Plaintiff John Doe's claim for vicarious liability is dismissed;
• Defendants' Motion as to Count IV is denied;
• Defendants' Motion as to Count V is granted.
• Defendants' Motion as to Count VI is granted in part. Plaintiff Jane Doe's claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress is dismissed;
• Defendants' Motion as to Count VII is granted; and
• Defendants' Motion as to Count VIII is granted.

Further, Defendants' "Motion to Grant as Uncontested their Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint" (Doc. #7) is DENIED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DOE v. SCHNEIDER
(Oct 29, 2009)