LEONARD DAVIS, District Judge
The Court referred the above-entitled and numbered civil action to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love. The Magistrate Judge presented for consideration the Magistrate Judge's Report, containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations for disposition of this case. No objections were filed.
Petitioner filed a letter requesting explanation of the following: The standing order refers certain cases to a Magistrate Judge. Petitioner received a consent form, which he did not sign and return; therefore, the undersigned, a District Judge, is presiding in this case, and the case was referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Love to propose findings of fact and recommendations for disposition of the case. Petitioner will not be appointed an attorney. Petitioner does not allege sufficient facts from which the Court can determine that appointment of counsel is necessary or that the case is unduly complicated.
This Court finds that the Magistrate Judge's findings and conclusions are correct, and adopts them as the Court's findings and conclusions. The Court therefore
ORDERS, ADJUDGES, and DECREES that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice; and
ORDERS that all motions not previously ruled on are denied.
So ORDERED and SIGNED