Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Da

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

David S. Roper appeals the trial court's judgment sentencing him to serve a total of twenty-five years after Roper was convicted of three counts of delivering a controlled substance. On appeal, Roper claims that the trial court erred in overruling his request for counsel at the resentencing hearing. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. ROPER
(Nov 3, 2009)