AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

Juan Roberts, Plaintiff, v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, et al., Defendants.

JUDGMENT ENTRY

STEVEN A. LARSON, Magistrate.

{¶ 1} On September 28, 2009, the magistrate issued a decision recommending judgment for plaintiff in the amount of $12,025.

{¶ 2} Civ. R. 53(D)(3)(b)(i) states, in part: "A party may file written objections to a magistrate's decision within fourteen days of the filing of the decision, whether or not the court has adopted the decision during that fourteen-day period as permitted by Civ. R. 53(D)(4)(e)(i)." No objections were filed.

{¶ 3} The court determines that there is no error of law or other defect evident on the face of the magistrate's decision. Therefore, the court adopts the magistrate's decision and recommendation as its own, including findings of fact and conclusions of law contained therein.

{¶ 4} Judgment is rendered for plaintiff in the amount of $12,025 which includes the filing fee paid by plaintiff. Court costs are assessed against defendant. The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROBERTS v. OHIO DEPT. OF REHAB. CORRECTION, 2006-05551 (11-3-2009)
(Nov 3, 2009)