Plaintiff established, through his deposition testimony and his affidavits, that he fell from a scaffold platform because the scaffold moved, despite the fact that the wheels were securely locked, when he bent down to begin his descent from the platform. Defendant failed to present any evidence to support its contention that plaintiff fell because he was climbing down the scaffold in an improper manner. The uncontroverted evidence that the scaffold failed and that no other safety device was provided either to prevent the scaffold from moving or to prevent plaintiff from falling demonstrates as a matter of law that the statute was violated and that the violation was a proximate cause of plaintiffs injuries ( see Blake v Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of N.Y. City, 1 NY3d 280, 287; Williams v 520 Madison Partnership, 38 AD3d 464, 464-465; Orellano v 29 E. 37th St. Realty Corp., 292 AD2d 289).