AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ORLANDO ADAMS, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's waiver of his right to appeal does not preclude him from challenging the voluntariness of his plea ( see People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 10; People v Morrow, 48 AD3d 704, 705). However, the defendant's contention that his plea was not knowingly and voluntarily made is unpreserved for appellate review because he never moved to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction ( see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665-666; People v Velez, 64 AD3d 799; People v Bolton, 63 AD3d 1087; People v Antoine, 59 AD3d 560; People v Rufa, 57 AD3d 697; People v Luster, 45 AD3d 866), and we decline to review the issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. ADAMS
(Nov 10, 2009)