AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSE PINERO-BAEZ, Appellant.

The court properly exercised its discretion in permitting the People to introduce a threatening statement, containing the words "I shoot people," that defendant made to a court officer who was trying to escort him back to Department of Correction custody following a court appearance. This entire statement, including the quoted phrase, expressed a threat to use force against the officer, and was highly probative of defendant's intent to prevent the officer "from performing a lawful duty" (Penal Law § 120.05). In any event, even if the phrase "I shoot people" should have been redacted, its admission was harmless.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349). There was ample evidence to support the element of physical injury ( see e.g. People v Wade, 41 AD3d 288, lv denied 9 NY3d 883). That element can be established through a victim's credible description of his or her injuries ( see People v Guidice, 83 NY2d 630, 636); in any event, the officer's testimony was corroborated by medical records.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. PINERO-BAEZ
(Nov 10, 2009)