Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Kareem A. MARTIN, Defendant/Appellant.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Kareem A. Martin, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of attempted robbery in the first degree, in violation of sections 564.011 and 569.020 RSMo (2000); assault in the first degree, in violation of section 565.050 RSMo (2000); and two counts of armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a prior and persistent offender and sentenced him to ten years imprisonment on each count, to be served concurrently.

No error of law appears, and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. MARTIN
(Nov 17, 2009)