AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

LUZ ROSARIO, Respondent, v. BNS BUILDINGS, LLC, et al., Appellants.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances, where, inter alia, the plaintiff established that the proposed medical testing was potentially dangerous ( cf. Lefkowitz v Nassau County Med. Ctr., 94 AD2d 18, 21), the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendants' motion which was to compel her to submit to the proposed testing ( see Santero v Kotwal, 4 AD3d 464, 465; Bobka v Mann, 308 AD2d 497, 498; Marino v Pena, 211 AD2d 668, 668-669).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROSARIO v. BNS BUILDINGS
(Nov 24, 2009)