Citation Codes Equivalent Citations citation codes Docket Number 153. Judges Opinion by Judge SMITH. See more information ... Smart Summary Factual and Procedural Background This appeal, captioned Richard E. Snyder, Appellant, v. Edgar M. Bronfman, Jr., Respondent, was presented to the Court of Appeals of the State of New York and decided on November 23, 2009 (docket 153). The opinion was authored by Judge SMITH. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Pigott and Jones concurred. The dispositive action in the opinion is the affirmation of a prior order, with costs. Legal Issues Presented The opinion addresses a procedural matter and does not frame distinct legal issues. Arguments of the Parties The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments. Table of Precedents Cited No precedents were cited in the provided opinion. Court's Reasoning and Analysis The opinion contains no substantive reasoning or analytical discussion. It consists of a brief dispositive statement: "Order affirmed, with costs." No explanation of the legal basis for affirmance is provided in the text. Holding and Implications Order affirmed, with costs. Implications: The direct effect is that the previously entered order remains in force and costs were awarded. The opinion does not articulate broader legal implications or establish new precedent. Show full summary ... RICHARD E. SNYDER, Appellant, v. EDGAR M. BRONFMAN, JR., Respondent. Opinion by Judge SMITH. Order affirmed, with costs.