Petitioner, suspected of marihuana use, was required to submit a urine sample, which twice tested positive for cannabinoids. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of using a controlled substance. After an unsuccessful administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, the positive urinalysis tests and the testimony of the correction officer who collected the urine sample and performed the tests provide substantial evidence to support the determination ( see Matter of Lopez v Fischer, 60 AD3d 1180; Matter of Smith v Fischer, 54 AD3d 1083, 1084). Contrary to petitioner's claim, the chain of custody was properly established as the officer who performed the tests had the sample in his possession at all times ( see 7 NYCRR 1020.4 [e] [1] [i]; Matter of McAdoo v Goord, 32 AD3d 1058, 1058-1059; Matter of Odome v Goord, 14 AD3d 975, 975-976).
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.