AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

WESTERN SURETY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. SUPERIOR CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION; BASIC ELECTRIC CO., INC.; C. STEVE CLARDY; THOMAS E. MILLER and PAMELA P. MILLER, Defendants.

ORDER

DAVID KEESLER, Magistrate Judge

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the "Motion for Summary Judgment" (Document No. 30) filed by Western Surety Company ("Plaintiff"). After granting several extensions of time for Defendants to respond, the parties notified chambers of the undersigned on October 14, 2009, that they had reached a settlement and would be filing a Stipulation of Dismissal. In light of the pending voluntary dismissal, the pending motion for summary judgment need not be considered on the merits at this time. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff's "Motion for Summary Judgment" (Document No. 30) is DENIED without prejudice.

In the unlikely event that settlement fails, Plaintiff would of course be permitted to refile its motion for summary judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WESTERN SURETY COMPANY v. SUPERIOR CONSTRUCTION CORP
(Dec 1, 2009)