Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

State of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Murphy Lee Williams, Defendant and Appellant.

MEMORANDUM DECISION

PER CURIAM:

Murphy Lee Williams appeals his convictions and sentences for various crimes. Williams's counsel filed a brief in accordance withAnders v. California, 386 U.S. 783 (1967), and State v. Clayton, 639 P.2d 168 (Utah 1981). The brief "objectively demonstrate[s] that the issues raised are frivolous." State v. Flores, 855 P.2d 258, 260 (Utah Ct. App. 1993) (per curiam);see also Dunn v. Cook, 791 P.2d 873, 877 (Utah 1990) (stating that an Anders brief must demonstrate any "potentially meritorious" issues are actually frivolous). Based upon our independent examination of the record, we determine that the appeal is, indeed, wholly frivolous, and accordingly, we affirm the decision of the district court and grant counsel's motion to withdraw.

Russell W. Bench, Judge, James Z. Davis, Judge, Carolyn B. McHugh, Judge

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. WILLIAMS
(Dec 3, 2009)