AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

RITA ACKERT, Respondent, v. FRANCIS R. DAVID et al., Defendants, and KENNETH L. THOMAS III, Appellant.

McCarthy, J.

Plaintiff brought this action for injuries sustained as a passenger in a car driven by her husband which collided with a trailer pulled by a farm tractor operated by defendant Francis R. David and owned by defendant Kenneth L. Thomas III, David's employer. Thomas appeals the denial of his motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) for an order dismissing plaintiffs complaint against him.

Thomas argues that, as the owner of a tractor used exclusively for agricultural purposes, he is exempt from statutorily imposed vicarious liability for the negligence, if any, on the part of David ( see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388). Supreme Court properly denied the motion given that the complaint sufficiently pleaded a cause of action against Thomas and the parties have not yet engaged in discovery to determine whether Thomas's defense under Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388 (2) is applicable, notwithstanding affidavits from Thomas and David submitted in support of the motion ( see Valentino v County of Tompkins, 284 AD2d 898, 899; Henbest Morrisey v W.H. Ins. Agency, 259 AD2d 829, 830).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ACKERT v. DAVID
(Dec 3, 2009)