Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Derrick COLEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. SUTTON, M.D., in his/her indi

SUMMARY ORDER

Derrick Coleman appeals from the judgment of the district court granting summary judgment to defendants Reginald Sutton and Tamela Welburn. Coleman alleges that defendants violated his First Amendment rights by retaliating against him for raising oral complaints regarding the medical care they provided him. We assume the parties' familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues presented for review.

We affirm for substantially the reasons stated in the district court's opinion. See Coleman v. Sutton, 530 F.Supp.2d 451 (W.D.N.Y. 2008).

Finding no merit in Coleman's remaining arguments, we hereby AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COLEMAN v. SUTTON
(Dec 10, 2009)