Citation Codes Equivalent Citations citation codes Docket Number No. 08-50440. Attorney(S) Stephen Anthony Cazares, Assistant U.S., Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Sarah J. Heidel, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee. George L. Steele, Esquire, Law Offices of George L. Steele, Pasadena, CA, for Defendant-Appellant. Judges Arthur Lawrence Alarcon Stephen S. Trott Atsushi Wallace Tashima Acts Judiciary And Judicial Procedure — Courts Of Appeals — Jurisdiction And Venue — Final Decisions Of District Courts See more information ... Smart Summary Please sign up to generate summary. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lamon Lee CHRISTENSEN, Defendant-Appellant. MEMORANDUM This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. Lamon Lee Christensen appeals from the eight-month sentence imposed following revocation of the supervised release term he was serving following a jury-trial conviction for armed bank robbery and use of a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Christensen contends that the district court erred by imposing consecutive three-year and two-year terms of supervised release as part of the sentence on the under-lying conviction. As a result, he argues that the district court lacked jurisdiction to revoke his supervised release because his supervision expired upon completion of the initial three-year term, which occurred prior to the conduct resulting in the revocation of supervised release. We decline to reach the merits of this argument because an appeal challenging a revocation proceeding is not the proper avenue through which to attack the validity of the original sentence. See United States v. Gerace, 997 F.2d 1293, 1295 (9th Cir. 1993). AFFIRMED.