Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Rhonda WILKINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Appellant, Rhonda Wilkinson, appeals the district court's entry of summary judgment in her case alleging sexual harassment and unlawful retaliation during her employment by the Clark County School District.

Appellant alleged that the conduct of one of her coworkers was so severe and pervasive that it created a hostile work environment. See Porter v. Cal. Dep't of Corr., 419 F.3d 885, 892 (9th Cir. 2005). While some of the conduct complained of was unwelcome and sexual in nature, it was not so severe as to constitute a hostile environment. See id. Summary judgment was appropriate.

The retaliation claim is founded upon her permanent transfer to a different facility involving allegedly poor working conditions and reduced responsibilities. The transfer followed a threat by her direct supervisor that she would not have a career with the District if she pursued a harassment claim. This is indicative of an unlawful retaliatory motive. See Bergene v. Salt River Project Agric. Improvement Power Dist., 272 F.3d 1136, 1141-42 (9th Cir. 2001). The employer claimed the transfer was motivated by concerns for the appellant's safety, so there are material issues of fact. Summary judgment was not appropriate on the retaliation claim.

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part and REMANDED. Each party to bear its own costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WILKINSON v. CLARK COUNTY SCH
(Jan 4, 2010)