AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SALVATORE MARASA, Appellant-Respondent, v. JOHN ANDREWS et al., Respondents, and DONALD FIORE, Indi

Ordered that the cross appeal is dismissed as abandoned ( see 22 NYCRR 670.8 [e]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

An action to recover damages for fraud must be commenced within "the greater of six years from the date the cause of action accrued or two years from the time the plaintiff . . . discovered the fraud, or could with reasonable diligence have discovered it" (CPLR 213; see CPLR 203 [g]). For the purposes of the discovery rule, a plaintiffs cause of action accrues "at the time the plaintiff `possesses knowledge of facts from which the fraud could have been discovered with reasonable diligence'" ( Oggioni v Oggioni, 46 AD3d 646, 648, quoting Town of Poughkeepsie v Espie, 41 AD3d 701, 705).

Here, the fraud allegedly occurred in June 1999, and the plaintiff possessed knowledge of facts from which he could have discovered it by November 2004. Nevertheless, he did not commence this action until May 2007. Consequently, the Supreme Court properly granted those branches of the defendants' respective motions which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as time-barred.

In light of the foregoing, the defendants' remaining contentions are academic.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MARASA v. ANDREWS
(Jan 5, 2010)