Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

KEVIN R. KELLY Plaintiff, v. KAREN G. MILLS, Administrator, United States Small Business Administration, Defendant.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT

PAUL FRIEDMAN, District Judge

The Court previously dismissed without prejudice three of the counts in plaintiff's first amended complaint, see Kelly v. Barreto, Civil Action No. 05-900, Order at 1 (D.D.C. September 5, 2006), and granted defendant's motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on plaintiff's age discrimination claim. See Kelly v. Hairston, 605 F. Supp. 2d 175 (D.D.C. 2009). After a bench trial, and for the reasons given in the Opinion, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law issued this same day, it is hereby

ORDERED that JUDGMENT is entered for defendant on plaintiff's discrimination and retaliation claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq.

The Clerk of the Court shall enter a final judgment for the defendant on all claims and remove this case from the docket of the Court. This is a final appealable order. See FED. R. APP. P. 4(a).

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KELLY v. MILLS
(Jan 6, 2010)