Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

MARY JANE PIETSCH, Plaintiff, v. McKISSACK McKISSACK, Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RICARDO URBINA, District Judge

GRANTING THE PLAINTIFF'S SECOND MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT; DENYING AS MOOT THE PLAINTIFF'S FIRST MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT; DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS For the reasons stated in the court's Memorandum Opinion separately and contemporaneously issued this 12th day of January, 2010, it is hereby

ORDERED that the plaintiff's second motion to amend the complaint is GRANTED; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff's first motion to amend the complaint is DENIED as moot; and it is

ORDERED that the defendant's motion to dismiss is DENIED without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PIETSCH v. McKISSACK McKISSACK
(Jan 12, 2010)