Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

Justin Charles TEAGUE, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee.

M. MICHAEL KINARD, Judge.

Appellant, Justin Charles Teague, appeals from the circuit court's revocation of his suspended sentence. Appellant's counsel has filed a no-merit brief and a motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-3(k). Due to substantial deficiencies in the addendum, we order rebriefing.

On appeal, the appellant's brief is required to contain an addendum which must include true and legible photocopies of the order, judgment, decree, ruling, letter opinion, or workers' compensation commission opinion from which the appeal is taken, along with any other relevant pleadings, documents, or exhibits essential to an understanding of the case and the court's jurisdiction on appeal. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(a)(8) (2009). All that is contained in appellant's addendum is the judgment and commitment order entered after the revocation hearing. Notably absent from the addendum are the notice of appeal, the judgment and commitment orders in which appellant received suspended sentences, the terms and conditions of appellant's suspended sentences, and the State's petition or petitions to revoke. Pursuant to Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(b)(3) (2009), we are notifying appellant's counsel that he has thirty days from the date of this opinion to file a brief that is in compliance with Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(a)(8). The motion to withdraw as counsel is denied.

Rebriefing ordered; motion denied.

ROBBINS and GRUBER, JJ., agree.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TEAGUE v. STATE
(Jan 13, 2010)