AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HAI GUANG ZHENG, Appellant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from. The Supreme Court properly denied, without a hearing, that branch of the defendant's motion which was pursuant to CPL 440.30 (1-a) for DNA testing since the defendant failed to show that there was a reasonable probability that the verdict would have been more favorable to him had DNA tests been performed ( see CPL 440.30 [1-a]; People v Weay, 54 AD3d 695; People v Brown, 36 AD3d 961; People v Shenouda, 307 AD2d 938; People v Pugh, 288 AD2d 634; People v De Oliveira, 223 AD2d 766).

[Prior Case History: 2007 NY Slip Op 33009(U).]

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. ZHENG
(Jan 19, 2010)