AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MICHELLE L. BRADY, Respondent, v. RICARDO SINTYAGO, Also Known as RICARDO G. SINTYAGO, JR., Defendant, and ESTATE OF MADELYN SINTYAGO, Appellant.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

In the order appealed from, the plaintiff's motion, which the appellant opposed, was denied. While the appellant challenges certain factual statements set forth in the order, it is not aggrieved by these statements ( see CPLR 5511; Pennsylvania Gen. Ins. Co. v Austin Powder Co., 68 NY2d 465, 472-473; Parochial Bus Sys. v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 60 NY2d 539, 544-545; Sirius Am. Ins. Co. v Vigo Constr. Corp., 48 AD3d 450, 451-452). The appellant's remaining contentions relate to parts of the order which were issued sua sponte. No appeal lies as of right from an order which does not decide a motion made on notice ( see CPLR 5701 [a] [2]), and we decline to grant leave to appeal.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BRADY v. SINTYAGO
(Jan 19, 2010)