Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Attorney(S)
Judges

Kris Alan Hahn, Plaintiff, v. Thomas E. Bauer, Mark S. Wernick, J. Marshall, Peter Sichko, Michael O. Freeman, City of Minneapolis, and County of Hennepin, Defendants.

ORDER

JOAN ERICKSEN, District Judge

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes dated January 8, 2009. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, upon all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following Order.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant the City's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(4)(5) and (6) (Doc. No. 4), is GRANTED, and all claims asserted against the City are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;

2. Defendant Thomas E. Bauer's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 9), is GRANTED, and all claims asserted against Bauer are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;

3. The Hennepin County Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 15), is GRANTED, and all claims asserted against the Hennepin County Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, except for Count VI against Defendant Marshall, which is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;

4. Defendant Mark S. Wernick's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 32), is GRANTED, and all claims for damages asserted against Judge Wernick in his individual capacity are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and all claims for declaratory relief and for damages asserted against Judge Wernick in his official capacity are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and

5. This action is terminated.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HAHN v. BAUER
(Jan 27, 2010)