AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

JULEA WARD, Plaintiff, v. ROY WILBANKS, et al., Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS WILBANKS', CLACK'S, HAWKS', INCARNATI'S, OKDIE'S, PARKER'S, SEDLIK'S, STAPLETON'S, MARTIN'S, AND POLITE'S MOTION TO DISMISS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (# 23) AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S RULE 56(f) MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (# 38)

GEORGE STEEH III, District Judge

For the reasons set forth on the record at a January 28, 2010 hearing, defendants' motion for summary judgment as to ten of the defendants, due to lack of a substantial role in plaintiff Julea Ward's dismissal from Eastern Michigan University's ("EMU") Counseling Practicum course, is hereby GRANTED, IN PART, as to defendants EMU Regents Wilbanks, Clack, Hawks, Incarnati, Okdie, Parker, Sedlik, and Stapleton, and EMU President Dr. Martin. These defendants are hereby DISMISSED from this lawsuit, without prejudice. Defendants' motion for summary judgment as to ten of the defendants is hereby DENIED, IN PART, as to defendant EMU Dean of the College of Education Dr. Polite. Plaintiff Ward's Rule 56(f) motion for relief from defendants' motion for summary judgment as to ten of the defendants is hereby DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WARD v. WILBANKS
(Feb 1, 2010)