AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTON WILLIAMS, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. Since the defendant pleaded guilty with the express understanding that if he failed to successfully complete a Drug Treatment Alternative-to-Prison Program, the County Court would impose the enhanced sentence of which he now complains, he has "no basis now to complain that his sentence was excessive" ( People v Melendez-Smith, 66 AD3d 1042, 1043; see People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816, 817; People v Billups, 63 AD3d 750). In any event, under the circumstances, the sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS
(Feb 2, 2010)