AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

GREEN MOUNTAIN FINANCIAL FUND, LLC, Plaintiff, v. LORI RAPPAPORT LACROIX, et al., Defendants/Third Party Plaintiffs,

ENTRY

SARAH BARKER, District Judge

A motion to reconsider is appropriate where the court has misunderstood a party, where the court has made a decision outside the adversarial issues presented to the court by the parties, where the court has made an error of apprehension (not of reasoning), where a significant change in the law has occurred, or where significant new facts have been discovered. Bank of Waunakee v. Rochester Cheese Sales, Inc., 906 F.2d 1185, 1191 (7th Cir. 1990). "[M]otions to reconsider are not at the disposal of parties who want to `rehash' old arguments." In re Oil Spill by "Amoco Cadiz" Off Coast of France on March 16, 1978, 794 F.Supp. 261, 267 (N.D.III. 1992), aff'd, 4 F.3d 997 (7th Cir. 1993).

The movants have not shown the above circumstances with respect to the Entry of January 25, 2010, remanding the action to the state court from which it was removed. Their motions for reconsideration (dkt 121, 122, 123) are therefore denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GREEN MOUNTAIN FINANCIAL FUND v. LACROIX
(Feb 3, 2010)