Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Raymond SCHOLTES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla. 1979). In this appeal pursuant to Anders, Appellant's pro se brief raises issues of an involuntary plea which were not preserved for appeal by the filing of a motion to withdraw his plea. This affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant's right to assert such issues in a timely and sufficient rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief.

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed. 493 (1967).

GROSS, C.J., STEVENSON and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SCHOLTES v. STATE
(Feb 3, 2010)