Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Attorney(S)
Judges

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Charles William Prentice, Jr., Defendant.

ORDER

DONOVAN FRANK, District Judge

Based upon the Report and Recommendation of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson, and after an independent review of the files, records and proceedings in the above-entitled matter,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. That the Defendant's Motion to Suppress Confessions or Statements in the Nature of Confessions (Doc. No. [11]) is DENIED.

2. That the Defendant's Motion to Suppress (Doc. No. [18]) is DENIED.

3. That the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Indictment on the Grounds that the Court does not Have Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Doc. No. [19]) is DENIED.

4. That the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Indictment on duplicity grounds (Doc. No. [22]) is DENIED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

U.S. v. PRENTICE
(Feb 4, 2010)