AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALEX HINES, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The decision whether to permit a defendant to withdraw a previously-entered plea of guilty rests within the sound discretion of the sentencing court ( see People v Torres, 68 AD3d 1142; People v Miller, 68 AD3d 1134). The record supports the court's determination that the defendant's plea was entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently. The defendant entered his negotiated plea of guilty with the assistance of competent counsel, in exchange for a favorable sentence promise. Also, the defendant's claim of innocence was conclusory and unsubstantiated. Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying, without a hearing, the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea ( see People v Montalvo, 63 AD3d 1089, 1089-1090).

The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review ( see People v Brown, 47 AD3d 1162, 1163; People v Powers, 302 AD2d 685, 685), and, in any event, is without merit ( see People v Gonzalez, 299 AD2d 581, 582).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. HINES
(Feb 16, 2010)