AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALEX YAGUDAEV, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel ( see People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 712-715; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 146-147). To the extent that the defendant's claim involves matter dehors the record, it may not be reviewed on direct appeal ( see People v Haynes, 39 AD3d 562, 564). To the extent that the claim may be reviewed, defense counsel provided meaningful representation ( see People v Ennis, 11 NY3d 403, 415, cert denied 556 US ___, 129 S Ct 2383; People v Gomez, 67 AD3d 927, 927-928; People v Carter, 44 AD3d 677, 679).

The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05) and, in any event, are without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. YAGUDAEV
(Feb 16, 2010)