AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAVID WALSER, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's claim that some of the prosecutor's comments during summation were improper and deprived him of a fair trial is unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v Valdes, 66 AD3d 925; People v Lino, 65 AD3d 1263; People v Rodari, 2 AD3d 756). In any event, to the extent that any of the challenged comments were improper, they were not so egregious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial ( see People v Valerio, 70 AD3d 869; People v Franklin, 64 AD3d 614).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. WALSER
(Mar 2, 2010)