Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by

LAWRENCE C. OLECHNA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

DECISION and ORDER

THOMAS McAVOY, District Judge

This matter was referred to the Hon. Victor E. Bianchini, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Rule 72.3(d) of the Local Rules of the Northern District of New York. In a Report and Recommendation dated November 23, 2009 ("Report-Recommendation"), Magistrate Judge Bianchini recommended that the Commissioner's decision denying disability benefits be REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with his recommendation and pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g). No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been lodged and the time for filing objections has expired.

After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report and Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, this Court adopts the Report and Recommendation for the reasons stated therein.

Therefore, the Commissioner's decision denying disability benefits is REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with Magistrate Judge Bianchini's recommendation and pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

OLECHNA v. ASTRUE
(Mar 3, 2010)