AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

LOVE ALTONIO BROOKS v. WARDEN FREDRICK MENIFEE, et al.

ORDER

DEE DRELL, District Judge

For written reasons given by separate ruling on this date, the Court hereby enters the following dispositions:

(1) the Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment (Doc. 31) filed by the defendants, Fredrick Menifee et al., is DENIED;
(2) the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 37) filed by the plaintiff, Love Altonio Brooks ("Mr. Brooks") is DENIED; and
(3) the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 42) issued by the magistrate judge will be ADOPTED IN PART, as specified in the Court's ruling.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, because the defense of prescription has not been waived, and because the issue of whether state tolling provisions or the federal equitable tolling doctrine are applicable in this case has not been resolved, the Court will hold an evidentiary hearing limited to consideration of that issue on April 16, 2010, at 11:00 A.M. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Brooks will be present at this hearing.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BROOKS v. MENIFEE
(Mar 4, 2010)