Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

MICHAEL FENWICK, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al. Defendants.

ORDER

PAUL FRIEDMAN, District Judge

For the reasons given in the Opinion issued this same day, it is hereby

ORDERED that [20] defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that, to the extent the plaintiff attempts to state common law tort claims against defendants Andrew Pudimott, Jeremy Fischer, and John Mickle, those claims are DISMISSED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that on or before April 15, 2010, the plaintiff shall effect proper service of process on defendants Andrew Pudimott, Jeremy Fischer, and John Mickle or face dismissal of his claims against them under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that [27] the plaintiff's objection to and motion to strike all juvenile court records submitted by defendants in support of their motion to dismiss and/or for summary judgment is DENIED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that, on or before April 15, 2010, the parties shall submit supplemental briefs addressing the questions identified in Part II.C. of the Opinion accompanying this Order. Neither brief shall exceed fifteen pages in length; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the defendants shall obtain and file copies of the documents specified in Part II.C. of the accompanying Opinion on or before April 15, 2010.

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FENWICK v. U.S
(Mar 8, 2010)