Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

EDWARD F. LEBER another vs. JOHN M. GROSVENOR another. SAME vs. SAME.

Contract, Construction, Performance. An agreement, to "introduce, sell and prosecute the introduction and sale of" certain goods and "to use due diligence in the introduction and sale" of the goods, is complied with if the goods are put on the market and brought to the attention of the public, and an effort is made to induce the public to purchase them. Undertaking to introduce the goods does not mean to warrant that they will become popular with the public and will be purchased generally.

BY THE COURT.

The undertaking to introduce the defendants' goods did not mean that the plaintiffs warranted that those goods should become popular with the public and should be purchased generally. What it meant was shown by the specific agreement "to use due diligence in the introduction," etc. It was satisfied if the goods were put on the market, brought to the attention of the public, and an effort made to induce the public to purchase them. There was evidence warranting a finding that this was done.

Exceptions overruled.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LEBER v. GROSVENOR
(Nov 15, 1901)