AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WELLS FARGO BANK, Respondent, v. THAKUR DAS KARLA, Also Known as THAKUR DAS KALRA, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff met its initial burden of establishing its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by producing the mortgage, the unpaid note, and the affidavit of its vice-president, evidencing the appellants' default in their payment obligations ( see Capstone Bus. Credit, LLC v Imperia Family Realty, LLC, 70 AD3d 882; Eastern Sav. Bank, FSB v Sassouni, 68 AD3d 917; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Webster, 61 AD3d 856). In response, the appellants failed to raise a triable issue of fact relating to any bona fide defense to foreclosure ( see Cochran Inv. Co., Inc. v Jackson, 38 AD3d 704; Mahopac Natl. Bank v Baisley, 244 AD2d 466).

The appellants' remaining contentions are either raised for the first time on appeal and thus not properly before this Court ( see Sarva v Chakravorty, 34 AD3d 438, 439), or without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WELLS FARGO BANK v. KARLA
(Mar 23, 2010)